보험금(연금)을 지급하지 않은 보험회사에 대한 벌금 부과

보험영업 2019. 2. 7. 21:55

뉴욕 금융감독원(NY DFS)은 메트라이프 생명보험회사에 대하여 검사를 실시한 결과 13천명의 계약자에게 연금을 지급하지 않은 사실에 대하여 1,975만달러(약 222억원)의 벌금을 부과하고 189백만달러를 계약자에게 소급하여 지급해야한다고 2019년 1월28일 발표하였다. (메트라이프는 이미 123백만달러를 계약자에게 소급하여 지급한 상태이다.)

퇴직자에게 연금을 직접 지급해야하는 부담을  덜고자하는 기업들이 메트라이프 등 몇명 생명보험회사에 기업연금을 이전하였다. 따라서 기존 퇴직연금제도하에서 수급권이 있는 퇴직자들은 이 생명보험회사들의 단체연금 형태로 정기적으로 연금을 받게된다.

그러나, 2017년 메트라이프는 이 수급권자 중 수천명을 찾을 수 없었다고 감독당국에 자진신고하였고, 과소적립된 책임준비금을 510백만달러 더 쌓을 것이라고 2018년 2월에 밝힌 바가 있다.

"이 조치은 그간 메트라이프의 관리업무실패로 피해받은 계약자의 승리이며, 감독당국은 업무개선 요구 등을 통해 계약자를 보호하기 위해 노력하겠다"고 Maria T. Vullo 감독원 수석감독관이 말했다.

출처 : https://www.dfs.ny.gov/about/press/pr1901282.htm

Press Release

January 28, 2019

Contact: Richard Loconte, 212-709-1691

DFS SUPERINTENDENT VULLO ANNOUNCES THAT METLIFE WILL PAY A $19.75 MILLION FINE AND PROVIDE $189 MILLION IN RESTITUTION TO POLICYHOLDERS FOR FAILURES RELATED TO PENSION BENEFIT TRANSFERS

DFS Examination Revealed Insurer Violated Legal Requirements Governing Its Administration of Group Annuity Contracts, Procedures for Searches Against the Social Security Death Master File, and Variable Annuity Replacement Processes

Insurer Unlawfully Released Reserves on In-Force Annuity Contracts for Its Pension Transfer Business and Failed to Promptly Settle Group Annuity Pension Claims

$123 Million in Restitution Already Paid to Consumers Whose Benefits Were Lost or Delayed

Financial Services Superintendent Maria T. Vullo today announced that the Department of Financial Services (DFS) has entered into a consent order with MetLife Insurance Company, under which the insurer will pay a penalty of $19,750,000 for violations of New York Insurance Law stemming from a DFS examination which found that the insurer failed to properly locate and pay benefits to thousands of New York insureds and beneficiaries. As part of the consent order, MetLife will also pay retroactive benefits to policyholders in New York State and elsewhere totaling more than $189 million. The insurer has already paid $123 million of the approximately $189 million to consumers whose group annuity benefits had been lost or delayed, and will pay the remainder going forward.

“Today’s action is a victory for policyholders, whose benefits were not paid due to MetLife’s failures, with the Department taking the necessary action to protect consumers,” Superintendent Vullo said. “The restitution and other corrective actions mandated under this consent order will ensure that consumers are paid the benefits to which they are entitled and that an appropriate fine is paid and procedures put in place to prevent this from happening again. The Department appreciates MetLife’s cooperation in self-reporting its claims issues, resolving these matters, and committing to full restitution to all eligible beneficiaries.”

In addition to the benefits that have already been paid during the course of the DFS examination, MetLife is projected to make the following restitution to consumers:

  • $63 million set aside for expected death claims or escheatment based on a Social Security Death Master File process that DFS is requiring the insurer to use to identify life insurance and annuity contract holders who have died or where beneficiaries are unaware that they are entitled to benefits;
  • $1.85 million in monthly payments to consumers as the company completes a group annuity remediation process; and
  • $1.5 million in restitution to consumers whom the insurer failed to provide with accurate comparisons of fees and expenses when transferring from an existing to a new variable annuity contract.

 

In today’s consent order, MetLife was cited for violations dating back to 1992 and extending to 2017, including:

  • Improperly released reserves for 13,712 group annuity certificates, resulting in a subsequent reserve increase of more than $500 million;
  • Failure to adequately search for group annuity certificate holders to whom it owed pension benefits;
  • Failure to perform a cross-check against the Social Security Death Master File for group annuitants where a Social Security number was missing or a number was invalid;
  • Failure to take reasonable efforts to confirm the death of an insured and timely commence outreach to beneficiaries where it did not have specific information in its administrative systems;
  • Failure to research and timely commence outreach where certain variations of an insured’s information existed in its administrative systems;
  • Failure to ensure that variable annuity replacement disclosure statements were accurate and compliant with the law; and
  • Failure to present consumers with an accurate comparison of the fees and expenses between existing and proposed variable annuity contracts.

 

In addition to the fine and restitution, MetLife must take the following corrective measures:

  • Establish and maintain full statutory reserves for all group pension certificate holders;
  • Pay retroactive benefits with interest to already retired group certificate holders or their surviving beneficiaries; and
  • Send letters to all group annuity certificate holders no later than 5 years prior to the normal retirement date, including a certified letter around the normal retirement date, and letters at least every five years thereafter until the insurer pays benefits, escheats benefits under the Abandoned Property Law, or definitively determines that it has no payment obligation.

 

The consent order requires MetLife to retain a third-party servicer that specializes in locating beneficiaries who are due pension benefits and have not been paid. The insurer will be responsible for paying all expenses incurred by the third-party servicer.

The order also mandates that MetLife provide DFS with four detailed remediation plans providing for remediation or restitution to policyholders or their beneficiaries. Under the plans, the insurer will be required to undertake such activities as utilizing an enhanced death database which includes data from sources in addition to the Social Security Death Master File.

 

설정

트랙백

댓글

감독원, 연금에 대한 재검토 촉구

연금시장 2018. 8. 31. 00:11

퇴직연금 일시금이 제대로 계산되어 지급되었는지 재검토할 것을 영국 감독원이 촉구했읍니다.

퇴직자가 퇴직후에도 연기금에서 연금을 수령하는 미국이나 영국의 DB형 퇴직연금제도에서도 퇴직자가 원할 경우 연금이 아닌 일시금으로 수령할 수 있습니다.

그런데 최근 저금리가 지속되어 인플레이션을 감당하지 못하는 수준이 되다보니 연금수령보다 차라리 일시금을 수령해서 달리 노후를 대비하겠다는 사람이 늘고 있습니다.

이 과정에서 생각지도 못한 문제가 생겼습니다. 일시금을 연기금에서 빼가는 퇴직자에게 제대로 가치평가를 하지않고 후하게 줘서 내보낸다면 어찌될까요?
연기금의 재정건전정은 악화되고 그 피해는 고스란히 여전히 연금으로 수령하는 은퇴자들과 기금적립단계에 있는 재직자들에게 돌아가는 거죠.

그래서 영국 감독원(The Pensions Regulator)은 일시금으로 빼갈때의 값인 “cash equivalent transfer values”  (CETVs)가 과하다고 여겨지는 14개 연기금에 대해 가치산정 과정을 재검토해보라고 촉구했습니다.

 

출처 : https://www.ft.com/content/c9d497b0-aaa2-11e8-94bd-cba20d67390c?segmentid=acee4131-99c2-09d3-a635-873e61754ec6
 

 Pension schemes at risk from lump sum payouts, warns regulator
  
  
     Josephine Cumbo, Pensions Correspondent
  

   The Pensions Regulator has urged 14 company retirement schemes to consider cutting the cash offers made to members to give up their “gold standard” benefits, amid concern that “overly generous” payouts could damage the remaining funds.The amount of money flowing out of company “defined benefit” schemes reached a record £21bn over the past year, as tens of thousands of current and former workers converted their future retirement income stream into a cash lump sum. Many unretired members of these retirement plans, usually tied to final salary levels, were tempted to give up their pension rights by six-figure cash deals, at historical highs largely due to the effect of low interest rates inflating the lifetime value of the benefits.The Pensions Regulator wrote in February to the trustees of 14 plans experiencing high levels of requests from members to transfer their defined benefit rights, urging them to review the “cash equivalent transfer values” (CETVs), or deals offered. Concern over such transfers, which have accelerated since reform gave savers more freedom over their pension pots, have previously focused on the risk to individual savers of giving up a guaranteed lifetime income. But the letter also made clear the regulator was worried by the potential damage to the company pension funds of paying out large cash sums.“In light of the recent events concerning your scheme sponsors, we would expect you to take advice from your scheme actuary about whether the basis on which CETVs are calculated remained appropriate,” it said in a letter released following a freedom of information request.The regulator said this process would allow the trustees to “judge whether a reduction, or further reduction, should be applied to CETVs” in light of their assessment of the strength of the employer standing behind the pension scheme, also known as the covenant.The letter was sent to trustees of schemes, which were not named, as part of a drive to protect members from transfers that were not in their best interests, and from pension scams, as transfer activity peaked.Approximately 180,000 defined benefit pensions transfers took place in the two years to the end of March 2018, according to the regulator’s estimates.Steve Webb, director of policy with Royal London, which lodged the freedom of information request, said there was a concern that those transferring out were being offered cash lump sums on relatively generous terms at a time when the pension scheme itself might be in deficit or the employer regarded as vulnerable.“If large numbers of members transfer out on generous terms there would be a risk that the funding position of the scheme could worsen and the risk of remaining members not getting their full pensions could increase,” said Sir Steve. He believed the letter had been sent to the country’s largest schemes.

     Martin Hunter, principal with Xafinity Punter Southall, a consultancy, said: “The key overriding principle for trustees is to make sure the transfer offered is fair to the member, but the trustees need to make sure the remaining members are not disadvantaged by a transfer, if there’s a big deficit in the scheme.”Industry experts said CETVs had fallen at some defined benefit schemes after the letter was sent.“There are some schemes that are reducing their transfer values, because the funding level is low and or they have significant concerns about the covenant,” said Graham McLean, head of scheme funding, with Willis Towers Watson, the professional services firm.About £21bn of defined benefit transfers took place between April 2017 and March 2018, according to the Financial Conduct Authority. But the Office for National Statistics reported £37bn in transfers out of occupational schemes in 2017, up from £12.8bn the year before. This figure included transfers from defined contribution pension schemes, but experts said the figure was predominantly defined benefit transfers.The Pensions Regulator declined to say to whom the letter had been sent. Lloyds Banking Group and Barclays, who have both seen some of the highest levels of pension transfer activity of all FTSE 100 employers, said they had not been asked by the regulator to review the CETVs offered.

설정

트랙백

댓글