2034년에 공적연금 재정고갈 예상

연금시장 2018. 6. 11. 02:16

올해 미국도 1982년이후 처음으로 공적사회보장연금(Social Security)과 공적의료(Medicare)에서 재정적자가 예상된다고 6월5일 발표했습니다.

인구노령화로 사회보장 서비스를 받는 사람이 6,150만명으로 증가하고 공적의료 대상자도 5,840만명이 되어 재정 비용은 커져가는데, 경제성장 둔화와 고용저조로 세수가 감소해서 재원이 줄었으니 당연한 거겠지요.

의회에서 예산관련 특단의 조치를 취하지 않으면 공적사회보장은 2034년에 공적의료는 2026년에 고갈이 될 것이고 하네요.

미국만의 문제도 아니지만 예상보다 3년이나 빨라서 이 친구들 많이 당혹해하네요.

 

출처 : https://www.wsj.com/articles/social-security-expected-to-dip-into-its-reserves-this-year-1528223245

Social Security Expected to Dip Into Its Reserves This Year

Aging population is boosting the costs of Social Security and Medicare as growth projections ease

 
Social Security program’s cost will exceed its income this year. 

Social Security program’s cost will exceed its income this year. Photo: mario anzuoni/Reuters

By David Harrison

 

This is three years sooner than expected a year ago, partly due to lower economic growth projections, according to the latest annual report the trustees of Social Security and Medicare released Tuesday. The program’s income comes from tax revenue and interest from its trust fund.

The trust fund will be depleted in 2034 and Social Security will no longer be able to pay its full scheduled benefits unless Congress takes action to shore up the program’s finances. Without any changes, recipients then would receive only about three-quarters of their scheduled benefits from incoming tax revenues. 

The report also said that Medicare’s hospital insurance fund would be depleted in 2026, three years earlier than anticipated in last year’s report. Absent changes, the program then would be able to handle 91% of costs. The nation’s aging population is boosting the costs of Social Security and Medicare, while revenue gains lag due to slower growth in the economy and the labor force.

About 61.5 million people receive retirement or disability benefits from Social Security and 58.4 million receive Medicare.

The Social Security program works by using payroll taxes paid by workers and employers to pay for retirees’ benefits. What is left over is invested in the trust fund. Interest earned is reinvested in the fund.

Over time, the trust fund has grown to nearly $3 trillion. But long-running demographic trends threaten its finances. Last year, there were 2.8 workers for every Social Security recipient, down from 3.3 in 2007.

Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin said in a statement the Trump administration’s efforts to cut taxes, reduce regulatory burdens and overhaul trade agreements would boost economic growth and generate new money for the country’s two largest entitlement programs.

Social Security consists of two programs, one for retirees and one for people who claim disability benefits.

The retirement program’s reserves are projected to be depleted in 2034, a year sooner than projected in last year’s report.

The disability fund is expected to run out in 2032, as opposed to 2028 as forecast in last year’s report. The program’s financial health has improved in recent years as the growth in disability applications has fallen, the report said.

The tax cuts signed into law last year have slightly lowered Medicare and Social Security’s projected revenue over the next few years. Lower income-tax rates reduced projected revenue from the taxation of Social Security benefits. That means less money flowing into both programs because those revenues are transferred to the trust funds.

President Donald Trump’s decision to end a program offering young undocumented immigrants reprieve from deportation while allowing them to work also reduced anticipated tax revenue into the Social Security program, the report said.

Congress has debated ways of bolstering the programs’ finances, but hasn’t agreed on what to do.

설정

트랙백

댓글

핀테크가 연금시장에 미치는 영향은 미미하다

연금시장 2018. 6. 6. 16:54

 

핀테크가 연금시장에는 어떤 영향을 미칠까요?
사람들이 은퇴를 생각해서 저축하고 투자하고 은퇴후 일정한 소득을 확보하는 계획을 세웁니다....

와튼스쿨 Olivia Mitchell 교수님이 진행하는 팟캐스트에서 다른 건 다 기계가 해도 미래 은퇴후 삶을 고려하고 연금 예산을 추정하는 것은 여전히 사람의 몫이라고 얘기하시네요.

왜냐구요.
대다수 사람들이 미래를 대비하는것에 대해 아무 생각이 없기 때문이랍니다. 아무 생각 없는 사람한테 기계가 할 수 있는게 없다는 거죠

 

 

출처 : https://www.thestreet.com/video/you-need-a-retirement-budget-14604082

 

Fintech is Coming to Retirement Planning -- But You Still Need a Good Ol' Budget

Robert Powell, editor of Retirement Daily, spent time with Olivia Mitchell, the executive director of the Pension Research Council at the Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania, to talk about how fintech is coming to retirement planning and why you still need a good old-fashioned budget.

설정

트랙백

댓글

연금가입시 본인의 투자성향을 먼저 고려하세요

연금시장 2018. 6. 3. 13:40

안정적인 노후소득 보장을 위해서 모두가 반드시 연금을 들어야 할까요?

정답은 '사람마다 다르다'입니다....
투자성향이 높고 안정적 현금흐름에 만족하지 않는 분들에게 연금은 부적합하죠.

반면 cd금리 수준으로 인플레이션 리스크를 헷지하는 것에 만족하고 급격한 시장변화에도 안정성을 추구하시는 분에게는 연금이 괜찮은 대안입니다.

물론 연금가입시 각종 옵션과 특약을 얹게된다면 추가비용내거나 수령하는 연금액이 줄어든다는 것을 잊지마시구요.

 

출처 : https://www.kiplinger.com/article/retirement/T003-C032-S014-are-annuities-a-baby-boomer-retirement-solution.html

 

 

Are Annuities a Solution for Baby Boomers in Retirement?

The basics of how annuities work, how they can provide a lifetime stream of retirement income, their pros and their cons.

 

 

Retirement is posing a lot of challenges for Baby Boomers as many feel their money won’t last over 30 years. Lower interest rates and market fluctuations are making them pursue other options that will provide a safety net for the remainder of their lives.

SEE ALSO: Annuities: The 'Bad,' the 'Good' and the 'Misunderstood'

One potential solution for Baby Boomers is to purchase an annuity offering guaranteed income. With this, you can receive payments immediately or defer them, allowing the earnings to accrue tax-deferred with future payments taxed as ordinary income. There is no limitation on how much you can contribute to an annuity.

How do annuities work?

Annuities are contractual guarantees between you and an insurance company, either as a single deposit or multiple payments. In exchange, the insurance company follows through on the terms of the contract. Annuities grow tax-deferred until the interest is withdrawn, and payments can be taken as a lump-sum (which, although I’ve seen it, is not what I’d recommend) or through periodic distributions.

There are four basic types of annuities:

  • Immediate annuities offer a guaranteed fixed payment and are typically used to fund pension plans (e.g., for the rest of your life or, depending on your annuity terms, the rest of your spouse’s life).
  • Fixed annuities are similar to CDs, which promise a fixed interest rate over a set period of time through an insurance company instead of a bank. Rates for fixed annuities are typically higher than those offered by CDs.
  • Variable annuities allow you to directly invest in the stock market, usually through mutual funds although with less risk because your principal is guaranteed — but you’d have to pass away in order for your heirs to receive it. Payments will be based on the performance of your investments. The account usually carries some sort of guaranteed interest rate (although you would have to start receiving the payments in order to get the guarantee). On a side note, I’m not a fan of variable annuities. Most of the retirees I’ve met who had variable annuities with high fees had to surrender and receive less then what they put in to get out of them.
  • Fixed indexed annuities tie the interest rate they pay to an index, such as the S&P 500. The minimum a fixed indexed annuity will pay typically is 0% (meaning it is guaranteed not to lose money when the market falls), but it can significantly increase in comparison to a fixed annuity (although the top range is typically capped depending on the insurance company you purchase from, so it is imperative to find which ones have higher participation rates in the index chosen). You can also structure payments like immediate annuities.

Beyond the basic promise of receiving payments from the insurer, you can customize your contract to leave money to your spouse or your estate, and can work in guarantees that you’ll at least be able to get your initial deposit back should the performance be less than satisfactory. Be wary, however, that guarantees and other riders in your contract may come with added fees and costs. It’s important to be as informed as possible before making a decision.

See Also: The Myth of the Magic Retirement Number

Advantages Annuities Offer

1. Lifetime Income With Less Risk

The timing of withdrawals from a stock-based investment portfolio in retirement is always crucial and can be subject to “sequence of returns risk.” That means that if the market falls substantially when you are retiring or newly retired — just as you start taking withdrawals from your portfolio — your retirement savings could take a hit from which you can’t recover.

Understanding, and planning for, this risk will be the difference between running out of your retirement savings and never having to worry about retirement ever again. Market conditions can sway based on random occurrences, so timing can be extremely unfortunate. A portfolio can yield big returns for 20 years and then in one year set back all prior gains.

You can minimize this risk either by withdrawing a constant, non-inflation-adjusted, amount every year, or you could take an approach that incorporates guarantees with annuities.

2. Alternatives to Bonds

Bond interest rates move inversely with their prices, meaning that today’s bond holdings will drop in value in the future because interest rates have been predicted to rise in the coming years. Many retirees and investors have tried to combat this with dividend stock investments, but these can be volatile and risky, sometimes offering more problems than bonds.

One strategy that has worked to assist retirees from bond and stock market conditions while allowing them to retain income like a bond investment has been annuities. Besides this, other advantages include removal of bond default risk, and simplification of your investment management, which includes not having to pay management fees.

3. Principal Protection

Finally, annuities can be wonderful tools because of the principal protection they offer. Some annuities come with a guarantee that you will get all your initial deposit back from the insurance company at some point in time, generally to help make up for losses you may experience (in the case of variable annuities). The cost for this service is the only downfall to consider, usually in the form of an extra expense.

Downsides of Annuities

While annuities do offer a lot of positives, there are, of course, some negatives to consider. Variable annuities can come with a bevy of fees (such as a mortality and expense fee, administrative fees and the costs for riders), and they can be complicated and confusing to buy. In addition, they are guaranteed by the company that issues them, so it pays to check the company’s rating with a credit-rating firm such as Moody’s.

Another potential downfall is the amount of time you need to wait to have access the principal and interest, which is called the surrender period. Most companies make investors wait five to 10 years. So, you’d better be confident that you won’t have to withdraw your entire balance before that period is up, otherwise you’ll be looking at paying a surrender charge.

Also, if you take payments while you’re under age 59½, you may be faced with an additional 10% penalty from the IRS.

Who Should (and Shouldn’t) Consider Annuities

For investors who don’t need to secure a guaranteed stream of income for the rest of their lives or who aren’t worried about potential stock market fluctuations, annuities are most likely not the right fit.

However, for investors who would like higher interest rates than a CD, want to create a “personal pension” to last them through the rest of their lives or who want out of the stock market altogether, an annuity can be a considerable alternative.

In conclusion, annuities are not for everyone, but they can be a viable solution to Baby Boomers approaching retirement.

See Also: 4 Questions to Ask Before Adding an Annuity to Your Retirement Plan

Carlos Dias Jr. is a wealth manager and founder of Excel Tax & Wealth Group, an advisory firm offering strategic financial planning services to high-net-worth individuals, business owners, executives and retirees. He maintains a highly personal approach by accounting for the distinct needs that his clients have at different points in their financial lives. Dias is a contributor for Forbes, the Huffington Post, Kiplinger and MarketWatch.

Comments are suppressed in compliance with industry guidelines. Click here to learn more and read more articles from the author.

This article was written by and presents the views of our contributing adviser, not the Kiplinger editorial staff. You can check adviser records with the SEC or with FINRA.

설정

트랙백

댓글

저소득층의 아동 사망률도 많이 개선되었습니다

보험영업 2018. 6. 3. 13:25

저출산이 문제겠지만, 일단 태어난 아이들은 옛날에 비해 무탈하게 잘 살고 있습니다.

OECD자료에 의하면 1960년과 비교해서 전반적으로 소득과 무관하게 유아가 만 5세이전에 사망할 확률(뮈 아동 사망률이라고 불러도 좋을 듯)이 좋아졌는데, 특희 저소득 아동의 사망률이 급감한 것이 한눈에 들어옵니다.

50년전에는 4명중 1명 이상이 죽었는데 이제는 10% 미만이 되었고, 고소득층 아동 사망률과의 차이도 많이 줄었습니다.

 

출처: https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/child-mortality-by-income-level-of-country

 

child-mortality-by-income-level-of-country.svg

 

설정

트랙백

댓글

국채를 활용한 연금

연금시장 2018. 5. 29. 23:17

현재 종신연금은 은퇴후 한주만 지나서 사망해도 남는 자산은 없습니다.
다른 저축상품들은 인플레이션에 취약하고 게다가 수수료부담이 만만치 않습니다....

그런데 노벨경제학상을 수상해서 우리에게 친숙한 Robert Merton 교수(MIT)가 세계 최고 연기금 상아탑인 프랑스 EDHEC 대학원과 공동으로 그 대안을 연구하셨다고 지난주에 발표했네요.

노동자가 근로기간중에 국채를 매입하는데 퇴직할때까지 지급되는 이자는 없다가 은퇴후에야 그 이자와 함께 관련 수익들이 함께 지급됩니다.

 

출처 : https://www.economist.com/finance-and-economics/2018/05/19/pension-bonds-are-an-ingenious-idea-for-providing-retirement-income

 

Will Selfies stick?Pension bonds are an ingenious idea for providing retirement income

But everyone still needs to save more

WHEN people stop working, they need a retirement income. Some are lucky enough to have an employer-provided pension linked to their salary. Everyone else faces a difficult choice.

Some keep their pension pot in cash and watch as it is eroded by inflation. Others use savings products with high fees and risk being hurt by a stockmarket downturn. A third option is an annuity, which guarantees a lifelong income but vanishes at death, even if that is a week after retirement.

Lionel Martellini of EDHEC, a French business school, and Robert Merton of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (a Nobel laureate in economics) have come up with an alternative. Workers would buy government-issued bonds while in employment; these would pay no interest until retirement. Over the next 20 years (the typical life expectancy on retirement) bondholders would receive payments comprising interest plus the return of the capital. These would be linked to inflation, or another measure such as average consumption. So a worker born in 1970, say, would buy a bond that made payments from 2035 until 2055. Every financial innovation needs an acronym, and these are called SeLFIES (Standard of Living Indexed, Forward-starting Income-only Securities).

They would act somewhat like annuities, though without protecting against the risk of living much longer than expected. One big advantage is that if holders die before the maturity date, the capital would be passed to their heirs. They could also be attractive to corporate pension funds and institutions such as sovereign-wealth funds. But if bond yields stay as low as they are now, workers will still need a big pension pot to be able to retire comfortably. The median pension pot of an American aged 40-55 is $14,500. That will not generate much income, whatever security it buys.

설정

트랙백

댓글

자동차보험료 지역별 차등제

보험영업 2018. 5. 27. 12:00

캐나다의 자동차보험료는 지역별 차등제를 적용하고 있습니다. 자기의 운전중 사고이력이나 운전행태와 상관없이 자기가 거주하고 있는 지역의 상태가 어떤지 그리고 자기주변에 어떤 자동차 사고이력을 가진 이웃과 거주하느냐에 따라 보험료가 바뀌는 거죠.

캐나다의 운전자 Steven Baker 씨는 Ossington Avenue 에서 도로폭이 비슷한 약 4km 북쪽 St. Clair Avenue 로 이사하는 통에 자동차보험의 연간보험료가 1,950달러(약162만원)에서 2,560달러(213만원)로 30.8%가 상승했다고 합니다.

보험가격을 산출하는 과학자이고 전문가인 보험계리사(actuary)는 통계자료를 바탕으로 어느 지역에서 자동차사고가 가장 많이 발생하는지를 기초로 보험료를 결정합니다. 과거에 많이 났으니 미래에도 유사하리라고 생각하는 거죠. 지역적으로 가까울지라도 교차로의 갯수, 교통표지판, 운전 제한속도 등이 환경이 다른 것도 가격차이을 만듭니다.

하지만, 보험의 원리야 어떻든 Baker씨는 억울합니다!

 

출처 : http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/toronto/car-insurance-driving-toronto-1.4673094

 

Man's car insurance shoots up $600 per year after he moves to new neighbourhood

A few days after moving, Steven Baker phoned his insurance company to inform them that his address in Toronto had changed. Then he was told his car insurance would shoot up by about $600 a year — just because of his new neighbourhood.

Despite Toronto man's clean driving record, a new postal code causes his premium to spike

What you pay in car insurance rates can have more to do with the traffic, speed and accident history in your neighbourhood than your driving history. (Craig Chivers/CBC)

A few days after moving, Steven Baker thought he was being diligent by phoning his insurance company to inform it that his home address had changed.

Once the provider put the new location into the computer, Baker says, he was told his car insurance shot up by about $600 a year — from $1,950 a year to $2,560.

 

"I was shocked," said Baker. "I asked them why. Nothing had changed. I hadn't had any accidents."

Baker said his provider, TD Insurance, told him the increase was because of his new postal code.

Baker had moved from a side street near Ossington Avenue and College Street to a similar sized road about four kilometres north near St. Clair Avenue and Dufferin Street.

"If you look, the two streets, they're almost identical in terms of the type of neighbourhood and the amount of traffic," said Baker.

Rates depend on area's collision history

Insurance expert Anne Marie Thomas said the reasons behind premiums aren't always easily visible.

"Actuaries look at statistics and instances to determine where accidents happen most frequently," said Thomas. "Where accidents happened historically is likely where they are going to happen in the future."

Steven Baker says his car insurance shot up $600 when he moved three kilometres north. (Steven Baker )

 

Thomas works for Kanetix.ca, a company that monitors insurance rates and helps consumers compare rates from different providers. Kanetix.ca also has mapped out areas in the Greater Toronto Area by postal code to show where rates are the highest.

 

CBC News Toronto used Kanetix.ca to compare the rates between Baker's new postal code and his old one.

 

How Ontario's soaring auto insurance rates could swing the provincial election

 

For a single 30-year-old with a clean driving record in a Ford Focus, TD's rates went up to $2,565 a year from $1,835. Thomas said there could be numerous factors that cause that increase. The roads may be wider, speed limits higher or there could be more theft in Baker's new area. When Baker asked TD Insurance for an explanation, he said, the person on the phone told him his new location had more intersections.

Baker wants providers to look at driver's history

"I asked him if he could tell me a neighborhood where I could move to where my insurance rates would go down, and he said Front Street," said Baker. "That got me a bit upset because that's all intersections and [Front Street is] much busier than the neighborhood that I moved into."

The downtown section of Front Street near Union Station may seem busier, but Thomas said that congestion leads to less severe accidents, something actuaries take into account.

"We're not going at 60 km/h," said Thomas. "Because of traffic we're going at 20 km/h. If we hit the vehicle in front of us the damage is going to be less."

CBC reached out to TD Insurance with Baker's information and the company confirmed that risk profiles are tied to a person's neighbourhood.

 

"Even within small geographic distances, claims rates can vary widely due to a number of factors like traffic density, levels of pedestrian traffic and weather exposure," said TD Bank Group spokesperson Crystal Jongeward.

Still, the idea of setting a driver's rate based on their address frustrates Baker, and he's going to start looking into other providers.

"A driver's behaviour and accident record is what they should be looking at. Not where someone happens to be parking their car," said Baker.

The practice of determining premiums based on postal codes has been under scrutiny for a while. Both the NDP and the Liberals are promising to halt it if they're elected next month.

Thomas said that although it sounds like a good idea, she doesn't know how it could work, because "so many facets of an insurance premium are tied to where you live."

설정

트랙백

댓글

건강하게 오래살기 아이디어 공모

보험영업 2018. 5. 20. 18:51

미국 보험계리사회(SOA)가 그냥 장수하는 것이 아니라 건강하게 오래사는 것(Will; Workable Innovations for Living Longer)에 대해 고민하고 있네요.

보험계리적인 측면이외에 사회적, 육체적, 정신건강적 측면에서 다양한 아이디어를 계리사뿐만아니라 일반인들을 상대로 폭넓게 아이디어를 모집하고 있네요. 5월말까지이니까 혹시 아이디어 있으신 분들은 응모하세요

 

출처 : https://www.soa.org/research/opportunities/2018-will-contest/

 

2018 SOA Workable Innovations for Living Longer Contest

The Society of Actuaries (SOA) has long recognized that the actuarial profession could play a key role in helping public stakeholders (general public, policy makers, and regulators) understand the drivers of changing longevity. However, ideas on improving longevity and mortality can come from all types of professions. This led the SOA Longevity Advisory Group and SOA Research Department to hold a Workable Innovations for Living Longer (WILL) Contest, which allows for individuals or teams (actuarial and non-actuarial) to submit an idea that will help people extend their healthy life expectancy by social, physical, and/or psychological methods.

 

Podcast

Research Insights - 2018 SOA Workable Innovations for Living Longer Contest

About the WILL Contest

Whether you are an individual with an idea, or a team with unlimited members, the contest is meant to inspire creative ideas and solutions to extend healthy life expectancies. There are only two limitations on what ideas can be submitted: 1) it must be something that can be practically used or performed to help people achieve a longer life expectancy, and 2) it must be a new idea (see the official rules for more information).

 

Submissions will be in the form of an up to two-minute video “pitch” and a written explanation (no more than 1,000 words) of the idea from the individual/team. The video (or YouTube hyperlink) and written explanation must be submitted to Karen M. Williams at kmwilliams@soa.org no later than May 31, 2018.

Entries will be judged based on the following criteria:

  • Originality: Extent to which the idea is different than what is currently available or known;
  • Practicality: Extent to which the idea can be practically applied;
  • Clarity of Pitch: Clarity of the presentation of the idea; and
  • Impact of the Idea: Magnitude of the effect and the number of individuals benefitting from the improvement generated by the idea.

Finals to Be Held at the 2018 SOA Annual Meeting & Exhibit in Nashville, Tenn., October 2018

After an initial round of interviews with select entrants, up to 5 finalists will be notified by July 31, 2018. All finalists (individual or one individual per team) will receive round trip airfare, one night of hotel accommodations at the Omni Nashville, and complimentary one-day registration for the 2018 SOA Annual Meeting & Exhibit in Nashville on October 15, 2018. The finalists will make a live presentation of their ideas at a session at this meeting, where votes from the judges and audience will determine the winners.

The Grand Prize is $10,000, with Second Place Winner receiving $5,000, and Third Place Winner receiving $1,000.

Read the official rules of the 2018 SOA Workable Innovations for Living Longer (WILL) Contest and send submissions by May 31, 2018. Any questions or clarifications on these rules should be directed to the SOA via email to kmwilliams@soa.org.

설정

트랙백

댓글

동경의 OECD 연금회의

연금시장 2018. 5. 20. 18:48

캐나다 밀레프스키 연금학 교수님이 지난달말 동경에서 열렸던 OECD회의 참가 후기를 남기셨습니다.

이 회의에서 교수님은 퇴직연금 등을 일시금이 아닌 연금으로 지급받는 것(소위 annuity puzzle 문제)이 얼마나 중요한지 강조하시고 연금지급을 확대하기 위한 아이디어(톤틴연금) 등을 발제하셨다고 참가자들로부터 들었습니다.

...

자기가 여생동안 풍족하게 소비하는 것보다 자녀에게 유산을 남기고자 하는 상속동기(bequest motive)가 아시아쪽 국가들에서 두드러지게 나타나는 점, 미국 대형 보험회사의 아시아 문화권에 끼치는 거대한 영향력을 설명하고 가장 과감하게 톤틴연금을 받아들인 일본을 높게 평가하고 있네요.

 

출처 : https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/world-decumulation-moshe-arye-milevsky

OECD Meeting at the ADB. Tokyo. April 2018.

A World of Decumulation

  •  

    I recently spent a week in Tokyo, where among other engagements I was attending and speaking at an OECD-sponsored conference on insurance in Asia. Although the theme of the conference was quite broad and included discussions of cyber-security as well as climate-change and insurance, a full day was devoted to pensions and decumulation (a.k.a. drawdown strategies.)

    The slides and presentations are here

    The OECD which is based in Paris has been working on developing guidelines or best practices for global retirement income systems, which they are hoping will be adopted by the 35-member countries as well as outsiders who would like to join the exclusive OECD club. Needless to say, the OECD is nudging anyone who will listen away from unfunded Defined Benefit (DB) systems towards funded (DC-type) plans. This is not uncontroversial, mind you.

    In addition to the formal conference keynotes and presentations -- very formal, it’s Japan after all – over the long breaks I had the opportunity to chat with government officials from Myanmar, Estonia, Indonesia, Thailand, Cambodia, Singapore and Dubai (and other places I would never dare visit.) Think of it as the United Nations of insurance and pension regulators, all in a safe conference room.

    Over the course of two days I learned many new financial factoids which I'm not quite sure where to store in memory – for example, insurance sales in the Greater Mekong Sub-region are increasing by over 100% per year – and I collected many business cards, which by the way is still done in that part of the world. I also learned how to bow, which I really like.

    On a more relevant note – listening to representatives from both industry and government – I was struck by the following: 

    1.) Retirement income is truly a global concern and there is a growing awareness that financial literacy and education must go hand-in-hand with any product solutions. A perfect system is useless if consumers don’t understand it and appreciate it. People vote for things they understand.

    2.) Many countries and regulators are still looking to the U.S. financial services sector and their companies for solutions, mainly because of their experience and scale. The big U.S. company names you would recognize were all there.

    3.) The unique and peculiar culture of different countries often makes it impossible to implement solutions that would seem quite logical to a (western trained) financial economist. When I would ask: “Why did you design that particular feature in that odd way?” the response was: “Otherwise, it would never sell.

    4.) Life annuities are very popular and used as the bedrock of retirement income in some countries (Singapore, and to a certain extent India) but are either non-existent (e.g. Cambodia, etc.) or extremely unpopular in others. The bequest motive is a very powerful factor in these countries. I pledge to add them to my simple life-cycle utility functions going forward!

    Finally, for those of you interested in innovative retirement income products, in April of 2016 the Japanese insurance company Nippon Life launched a tontine-type annuity. Yes. Moreover, they actually use the word tontine front-and-center in the product description. They are very proud of the 17th century heritage of the idea, with no marketing fears or image concerns. The word tontine is (by now) known to a much larger segment of the population. But then again, the temple Manji symbol is also growing in popularity. Yikes!

    설정

    트랙백

    댓글